Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry (2024)

Abstract

Background The optimal management of ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis during endovascular treatment (EVT) is unclear. We compared the outcomes of two different strategies: EVT with vs without carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods In this observational study, we included patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke undergoing EVT and a concomitant ipsilateral extracranial ICA stenosis of ≥50% or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin, from the Dutch Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2017). The primary endpoint was a good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Secondary endpoints were successful intracranial reperfusion, new clot in a different vascular territory, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, recurrent ischaemic stroke and any serious adverse event. Results Of the 433 included patients, 169 (39%) underwent EVT with CAS. In 123/168 (73%) patients, CAS was performed before intracranial thrombectomy. In 42/224 (19%) patients who underwent EVT without CAS, a deferred carotid endarterectomy or CAS was performed. EVT with and without CAS were associated with similar proportions of good functional outcome (47% vs 42%, respectively; adjusted OR (aOR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.62). There were no major differences between the groups in any of the secondary endpoints, except for the increased odds of a new clot in a different vascular territory in the EVT with CAS group (aOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.21). Conclusions Functional outcomes were comparable after EVT with and without CAS. CAS during EVT might be a feasible option to treat the extracranial ICA stenosis but randomised studies are warranted to prove non-inferiority or superiority.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-237
Number of pages9
JournalStroke and Vascular Neurology
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date26 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Atherosclerosis
  • Carotid Stenosis
  • Stents
  • Stroke
  • Thrombectomy

Access to Document

  • 229.fullFinal published version, 946 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Other files and links

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    View full fingerprint

    Cite this

    • APA
    • Author
    • BIBTEX
    • Harvard
    • Standard
    • RIS
    • Vancouver

    Collette, S. L., Rodgers, M. P., Van Walderveen, M. A. A., Compagne, K. C. J., Nederkoorn, P. J., Hofmeijer, J., Martens, J. M., De Borst, G. J., Luijckx, G. J. R., Majoie, C. B. L. M., Van Der Lugt, A., Bokkers, R. P. H., Uyttenboogaart, M., & MR CLEAN Registry Investigators (2023). Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 8(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-001891

    Collette, Sabine L. ; Rodgers, Michael P. ; Van Walderveen, Marianne A.A. et al. / Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke : results from the MR CLEAN Registry. In: Stroke and Vascular Neurology. 2023 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 229-237.

    @article{f7fd22c4eb684a3a8d4cce4b64e78804,

    title = "Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry",

    abstract = "Background The optimal management of ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis during endovascular treatment (EVT) is unclear. We compared the outcomes of two different strategies: EVT with vs without carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods In this observational study, we included patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke undergoing EVT and a concomitant ipsilateral extracranial ICA stenosis of ≥50% or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin, from the Dutch Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2017). The primary endpoint was a good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Secondary endpoints were successful intracranial reperfusion, new clot in a different vascular territory, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, recurrent ischaemic stroke and any serious adverse event. Results Of the 433 included patients, 169 (39%) underwent EVT with CAS. In 123/168 (73%) patients, CAS was performed before intracranial thrombectomy. In 42/224 (19%) patients who underwent EVT without CAS, a deferred carotid endarterectomy or CAS was performed. EVT with and without CAS were associated with similar proportions of good functional outcome (47% vs 42%, respectively; adjusted OR (aOR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.62). There were no major differences between the groups in any of the secondary endpoints, except for the increased odds of a new clot in a different vascular territory in the EVT with CAS group (aOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.21). Conclusions Functional outcomes were comparable after EVT with and without CAS. CAS during EVT might be a feasible option to treat the extracranial ICA stenosis but randomised studies are warranted to prove non-inferiority or superiority.",

    keywords = "Atherosclerosis, Carotid Stenosis, Stents, Stroke, Thrombectomy",

    author = "Collette, {Sabine L.} and Rodgers, {Michael P.} and {Van Walderveen}, {Marianne A.A.} and Compagne, {Kars C.J.} and Nederkoorn, {Paul J.} and Jeannette Hofmeijer and Martens, {Jasper M.} and {De Borst}, {Gert J.} and Luijckx, {Gert Jan R.} and Majoie, {Charles B.L.M.} and {Van Der Lugt}, Aad and Bokkers, {Reinoud P.H.} and Maarten Uyttenboogaart and {MR CLEAN Registry Investigators}",

    note = "Funding Information: The MR CLEAN Registry was partly funded by Toegepast Wetenschappelijk Instituut voor Neuromodulatie (TWIN) Foundation, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Funding Information: Amsterdam University Medical Centre received funds from Stryker for consultations by Professor Dr Majoie, Professor Dr Roos and Dr Berkhemer. Maastricht University Medical Centre received funds from Stryker and Codman for consultations by Professor Dr Van Zwam. Dr Nederkoorn: Grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation and Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research. Professor Dr Majoie: Related: Grants TWIN Foundation; Unrelated: Grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, European Commission, TWIN Foundation, Health Evaluation Netherlands (all paid to institution); shareholder of Nico-lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical image analysis (modest). Professor Dr Van der Lugt: Grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Brain Foundation, European Commission, Stryker, Medtronic, Penumbra, Cerenovus, Philips, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare all paid to institution. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ",

    year = "2023",

    month = jun,

    doi = "10.1136/svn-2022-001891",

    language = "English",

    volume = "8",

    pages = "229--237",

    journal = "Stroke and Vascular Neurology",

    issn = "2059-8688",

    publisher = "BMJ",

    number = "3",

    }

    Collette, SL, Rodgers, MP, Van Walderveen, MAA, Compagne, KCJ, Nederkoorn, PJ, Hofmeijer, J, Martens, JM, De Borst, GJ, Luijckx, GJR, Majoie, CBLM, Van Der Lugt, A, Bokkers, RPH, Uyttenboogaart, M & MR CLEAN Registry Investigators 2023, 'Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry', Stroke and Vascular Neurology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-001891

    Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry. / Collette, Sabine L.; Rodgers, Michael P.; Van Walderveen, Marianne A.A. et al.
    In: Stroke and Vascular Neurology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 06.2023, p. 229-237.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke

    T2 - results from the MR CLEAN Registry

    AU - Collette, Sabine L.

    AU - Rodgers, Michael P.

    AU - Van Walderveen, Marianne A.A.

    AU - Compagne, Kars C.J.

    AU - Nederkoorn, Paul J.

    AU - Hofmeijer, Jeannette

    AU - Martens, Jasper M.

    AU - De Borst, Gert J.

    AU - Luijckx, Gert Jan R.

    AU - Majoie, Charles B.L.M.

    AU - Van Der Lugt, Aad

    AU - Bokkers, Reinoud P.H.

    AU - Uyttenboogaart, Maarten

    AU - MR CLEAN Registry Investigators

    N1 - Funding Information:The MR CLEAN Registry was partly funded by Toegepast Wetenschappelijk Instituut voor Neuromodulatie (TWIN) Foundation, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Funding Information:Amsterdam University Medical Centre received funds from Stryker for consultations by Professor Dr Majoie, Professor Dr Roos and Dr Berkhemer. Maastricht University Medical Centre received funds from Stryker and Codman for consultations by Professor Dr Van Zwam. Dr Nederkoorn: Grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation and Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research. Professor Dr Majoie: Related: Grants TWIN Foundation; Unrelated: Grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, European Commission, TWIN Foundation, Health Evaluation Netherlands (all paid to institution); shareholder of Nico-lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical image analysis (modest). Professor Dr Van der Lugt: Grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Brain Foundation, European Commission, Stryker, Medtronic, Penumbra, Cerenovus, Philips, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare all paid to institution. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Publisher Copyright:© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

    PY - 2023/6

    Y1 - 2023/6

    N2 - Background The optimal management of ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis during endovascular treatment (EVT) is unclear. We compared the outcomes of two different strategies: EVT with vs without carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods In this observational study, we included patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke undergoing EVT and a concomitant ipsilateral extracranial ICA stenosis of ≥50% or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin, from the Dutch Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2017). The primary endpoint was a good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Secondary endpoints were successful intracranial reperfusion, new clot in a different vascular territory, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, recurrent ischaemic stroke and any serious adverse event. Results Of the 433 included patients, 169 (39%) underwent EVT with CAS. In 123/168 (73%) patients, CAS was performed before intracranial thrombectomy. In 42/224 (19%) patients who underwent EVT without CAS, a deferred carotid endarterectomy or CAS was performed. EVT with and without CAS were associated with similar proportions of good functional outcome (47% vs 42%, respectively; adjusted OR (aOR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.62). There were no major differences between the groups in any of the secondary endpoints, except for the increased odds of a new clot in a different vascular territory in the EVT with CAS group (aOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.21). Conclusions Functional outcomes were comparable after EVT with and without CAS. CAS during EVT might be a feasible option to treat the extracranial ICA stenosis but randomised studies are warranted to prove non-inferiority or superiority.

    AB - Background The optimal management of ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis during endovascular treatment (EVT) is unclear. We compared the outcomes of two different strategies: EVT with vs without carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods In this observational study, we included patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke undergoing EVT and a concomitant ipsilateral extracranial ICA stenosis of ≥50% or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin, from the Dutch Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2017). The primary endpoint was a good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Secondary endpoints were successful intracranial reperfusion, new clot in a different vascular territory, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, recurrent ischaemic stroke and any serious adverse event. Results Of the 433 included patients, 169 (39%) underwent EVT with CAS. In 123/168 (73%) patients, CAS was performed before intracranial thrombectomy. In 42/224 (19%) patients who underwent EVT without CAS, a deferred carotid endarterectomy or CAS was performed. EVT with and without CAS were associated with similar proportions of good functional outcome (47% vs 42%, respectively; adjusted OR (aOR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.62). There were no major differences between the groups in any of the secondary endpoints, except for the increased odds of a new clot in a different vascular territory in the EVT with CAS group (aOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.21). Conclusions Functional outcomes were comparable after EVT with and without CAS. CAS during EVT might be a feasible option to treat the extracranial ICA stenosis but randomised studies are warranted to prove non-inferiority or superiority.

    KW - Atherosclerosis

    KW - Carotid Stenosis

    KW - Stents

    KW - Stroke

    KW - Thrombectomy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164042255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1136/svn-2022-001891

    DO - 10.1136/svn-2022-001891

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 36572506

    AN - SCOPUS:85164042255

    SN - 2059-8688

    VL - 8

    SP - 229

    EP - 237

    JO - Stroke and Vascular Neurology

    JF - Stroke and Vascular Neurology

    IS - 3

    ER -

    Collette SL, Rodgers MP, Van Walderveen MAA, Compagne KCJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Hofmeijer J et al. Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry. Stroke and Vascular Neurology. 2023 Jun;8(3):229-237. Epub 2022 Dec 26. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-001891

    Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry (2024)

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Arielle Torp

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5947

    Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

    Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Arielle Torp

    Birthday: 1997-09-20

    Address: 87313 Erdman Vista, North Dustinborough, WA 37563

    Phone: +97216742823598

    Job: Central Technology Officer

    Hobby: Taekwondo, Macrame, Foreign language learning, Kite flying, Cooking, Skiing, Computer programming

    Introduction: My name is Arielle Torp, I am a comfortable, kind, zealous, lovely, jolly, colorful, adventurous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.